Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,967,449 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.813. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.345% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 344.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $128,140, a difference of 64.4%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $111,519, a difference of 59.3%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $56,709, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $71,567, a difference of 33.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $62,083, a difference of 38.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 75.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 64.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 53.9%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 90.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 83.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 96.5%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 83.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%).