Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,413,304 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 30.6 Yugoslavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,558, a difference of 18.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,186, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $42,792, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,243, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,573, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 17.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.1%).