Chickasaw vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,715,712 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,603, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $86,595, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,029, a difference of 0.55%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,402, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,822, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.3%).