Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Yemen Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,364,127 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.808. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.095% in Immigrants from Yemen. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 95.4 Immigrants from Yemen.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 29.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $47,527, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $74,575, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,693, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $43,591, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $39,540, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 121.1%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 65.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 124.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 86.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 147.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 66.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 14.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 55.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 143.5%), college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.91%, a difference of 91.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.7%).