Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Israel
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Israel

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,654
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
109th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Israel Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,631,295 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 62.9 Immigrants from Israel.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Israel Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $57,384, a difference of 57.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $117,219, a difference of 50.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $122,893, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,913, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $69,857, a difference of 30.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Israel
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$57,384
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$127,430
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$104,090
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$57,034
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$68,716
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$46,902
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$55,913
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$117,219
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$122,893
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$69,857
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.3%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Israel
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Israel
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Israel
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Fair
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Good
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
83.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 44.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.86%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Israel
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
25.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 55.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Israel
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
49.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
15.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 133.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 101.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 98.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Israel
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Excellent
95.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
72.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
67.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
56.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
50.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 87.0%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 81.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Israel Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Israel
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%