Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,786,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $86,255, a difference of 23.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $101,170, a difference of 23.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $93,569, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,661, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,717, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 33.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.17%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.14%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.1%).