Chickasaw vs Maltese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Maltese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Maltese

Fair
Excellent
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,141
SOCIAL INDEX
88.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
30th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Maltese Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,696,102 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 19.7 Maltese.
Chickasaw Integration in Maltese Communities

Chickasaw vs Maltese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $110,064, a difference of 41.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $114,754, a difference of 39.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $97,015, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,735, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $66,027, a difference of 22.9%).
Chickasaw vs Maltese Income
Income MetricChickasawMaltese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$49,640
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$115,862
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$97,015
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$52,526
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$62,953
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$43,357
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$53,735
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$110,064
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$114,754
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$66,027
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.7%

Chickasaw vs Maltese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 52.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 23.7%).
Chickasaw vs Maltese Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawMaltese
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Chickasaw vs Maltese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chickasaw vs Maltese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawMaltese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Chickasaw vs Maltese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chickasaw vs Maltese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawMaltese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
38.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chickasaw vs Maltese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.99%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Chickasaw vs Maltese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawMaltese
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
49.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
27.8%

Chickasaw vs Maltese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.3%).
Chickasaw vs Maltese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawMaltese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Excellent
6.7%

Chickasaw vs Maltese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 51.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Chickasaw vs Maltese Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawMaltese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
69.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
63.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
41.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Chickasaw vs Maltese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 11.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.2%).
Chickasaw vs Maltese Disability
Disability MetricChickasawMaltese
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.5%