Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,894,553 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $51,465, a difference of 41.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $112,886, a difference of 37.3%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $95,800, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,705, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $42,508, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.1%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.41%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.91%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 78.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.2%).