Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Switzerland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,904,973 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.589% in Immigrants from Switzerland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 589.1 Immigrants from Switzerland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $54,866, a difference of 50.4%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $120,726, a difference of 41.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $115,934, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,528, a difference of 19.6%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,996, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.4%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.65%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 56.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 110.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 104.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 60.0%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.3%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.8%).