Chickasaw vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,491,954 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 8.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,015, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $46,368, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.21%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,631, a difference of 0.43%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $70,539, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 17.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.40%), family households (64.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 5.5%), college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.4%), ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.060%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.0%).