Finnish vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,812,980 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 59.4 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.9%), per capita income ($43,461 compared to $47,394, a difference of 9.0%), and median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $41,527, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.17%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $97,880, a difference of 3.5%), and median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $57,352, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.57%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.8%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.1%).