Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
297th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Central America Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,377,545 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $47,394, a difference of 35.5%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $108,830, a difference of 28.0%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $57,352, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $51,914, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $63,643, a difference of 19.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Central America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,974 | Exceptional $47,394 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $85,050 | Exceptional $108,830 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $74,217 | Exceptional $89,496 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $39,762 | Exceptional $48,913 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,538 | Exceptional $57,352 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,953 | Exceptional $41,527 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,022 | Fair $51,914 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,012 | Excellent $97,880 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,965 | Exceptional $104,992 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,420 | Exceptional $63,643 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.6% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 71.0%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 50.8%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.72%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Central America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Poverty | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Males | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.2% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Good 12.6% |
| Single Females | Tragic 24.8% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Excellent 16.0% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 33.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.1%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Central America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Females | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Central America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.7% | Exceptional 66.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.0% | Exceptional 38.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 75.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.2% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.8%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (44.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Central America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Family Households | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 31.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Average 46.3% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.49 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 44.1% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Excellent 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.4% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 40.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Central America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.9% | Excellent 9.9% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.1% | Excellent 90.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Good 55.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.4% | Fair 19.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.5% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 93.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 84.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Central America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 91.0% | Exceptional 96.5% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 89.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 86.6% | Exceptional 94.4% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 93.4% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 92.1% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 80.1% | Exceptional 90.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 68.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 48.5% | Exceptional 63.3% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 35.0% | Exceptional 50.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 42.6% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 17.4% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Central America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 19.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Central America | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Disability | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Fair 11.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.5% | Good 47.2% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Good 3.0% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Poor 17.5% |
| Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |