Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,031,313 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.550. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.537% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 536.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $51,914, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $63,643, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,248 compared to $47,394, a difference of 0.31%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $57,352, a difference of 0.38%), and median earnings ($48,617 compared to $48,913, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 11.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 10.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.4%), no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and ged/equivalency (89.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), associate's degree (50.6% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.81%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.2%).