Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,066,682 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 5.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 16.0%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $41,527, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,640 compared to $89,496, a difference of 0.16%), median family income ($108,251 compared to $108,830, a difference of 0.54%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $97,880, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.38%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.3%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.74%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.8%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (50.4% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 0.090%), bachelor's degree (42.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and college, 1 year or more (62.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.9%).