Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Fair
Exceptional
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,695,676 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.899. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 18.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $47,394, a difference of 31.7%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $108,830, a difference of 28.3%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $89,496, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,914, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $63,643, a difference of 20.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Good
25.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 48.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 22.5%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.4%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.6%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.76%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.82%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Excellent
30.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
6.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.3%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 58.1%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%