Canadian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,178,317 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 117.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.1%), median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $41,527, a difference of 4.5%), and per capita income ($45,858 compared to $47,394, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $57,352, a difference of 0.12%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $97,880, a difference of 0.26%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $104,992, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.1%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.3%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and male disability (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.2%).