Crow vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,671,412 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.777% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 777.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $47,394, a difference of 49.4%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $108,830, a difference of 42.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $104,992, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,914, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $41,527, a difference of 17.7%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $48,913, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 119.9%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 96.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 34.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.7%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 37.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 263.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 241.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 238.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.7%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 66.9%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 64.0%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.27%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 37.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.8%).