Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,685,167 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 13.2% | 9.1% |
| Range | 12.3% | 8.5% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 4.8% |
| Median | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Male Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Western Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 86.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 83.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Colombians | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Pakistanis | 80.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 80.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Lebanese | 79.9 /100 | #136 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 79.8 /100 | #137 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.2% |
| Kenyans | 79.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Bhutanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Korea (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Austrian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Polish (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Croatians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Irish | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.0% |