Samoan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,888,246 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 12.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $47,394, a difference of 19.0%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $57,352, a difference of 11.6%), and median female earnings ($37,498 compared to $41,527, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $63,643, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $104,992, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.3%), single father poverty (13.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.19, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.27%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 52.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.7%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.0%).