Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Shoshone

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Fair
Exceptional
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Shoshone Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,376,346 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.210% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 210.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Shoshone Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,072 compared to $47,394, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $104,992, a difference of 25.6%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $108,830, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $51,914, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $63,643, a difference of 18.6%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,072
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,872
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,660
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,932
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,930
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,677
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,720
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,062
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,588
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,681
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Good
25.3%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 42.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 40.4%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 17.1%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.9%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
9.9%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 85.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 18.0%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.8%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.3%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.3%
Exceptional
83.4%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.5%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.3%
Excellent
30.3%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
6.0%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.0%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.4%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.3%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.9%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%