Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,338,662 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 17.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $47,394, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $41,527, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,412 compared to $89,496, a difference of 0.090%), median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $57,352, a difference of 0.36%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $48,913, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.7%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.7%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.2%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%).