Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Subsaharan African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,940,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,152 compared to $47,394, a difference of 18.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $97,880, a difference of 16.2%), and median family income ($93,748 compared to $108,830, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $51,914, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $41,527, a difference of 8.2%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $48,913, a difference of 10.9%).
Income Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,152 | Exceptional $47,394 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,748 | Exceptional $108,830 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,631 | Exceptional $89,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,118 | Exceptional $48,913 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,408 | Exceptional $57,352 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,391 | Exceptional $41,527 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,691 | Fair $51,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,235 | Excellent $97,880 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,691 | Exceptional $104,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,615 | Exceptional $63,643 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Good 25.3% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.6%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.0%), single male poverty (13.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.1%).
Poverty Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.7% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and male unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.91%).
Labor Participation Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.7% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.6% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Excellent 30.3% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.2% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.9% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 6.0% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 68.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.3% | Exceptional 63.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.8% | Exceptional 42.6% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.7%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Disability Metric | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |