Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,894,579 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $47,394, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.4%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $41,527, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $97,880, a difference of 0.26%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $89,496, a difference of 0.45%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $63,643, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Exceptional $47,394 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Exceptional $108,830 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Exceptional $89,496 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Exceptional $48,913 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Exceptional $57,352 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Exceptional $41,527 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Fair $51,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Excellent $97,880 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Exceptional $104,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Exceptional $63,643 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.5%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.34%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.0%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.81%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.80%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Exceptional 68.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 63.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Exceptional 42.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |