Taiwanese vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Taiwanese
Chippewa
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Taiwanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,936,762 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.232% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 232.4 Chippewa.
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,900 compared to $70,539, a difference of 27.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $80,005, a difference of 26.9%), and per capita income ($46,455 compared to $36,631, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.68%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $47,015, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $35,003, a difference of 15.9%).
Income Metric | Taiwanese | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,455 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,295 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,900 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,902 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,556 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,576 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,804 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,492 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,180 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,894 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.0% |
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 61.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 53.1%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%).
Poverty Metric | Taiwanese | Chippewa |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 119.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 71.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Taiwanese | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 29.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Taiwanese | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.3% |
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 47.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Taiwanese | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 42.6% |
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Taiwanese | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 43.5%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Taiwanese | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 52.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.57%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.5%).
Disability Metric | Taiwanese | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |