Sioux vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,723,322 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 15.0 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $36,631, a difference of 8.0%), median family income ($82,386 compared to $86,852, a difference of 5.4%), and median household income ($67,792 compared to $70,539, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.17%), householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $47,015, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($45,566 compared to $46,368, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 59.9%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and single male poverty (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and receiving food stamps (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.52 compared to 3.20, a difference of 9.8%), single father households (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (41.5% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.2%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.1%), male disability (12.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%).