Finnish vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,961,494 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 25.4 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $83,943, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($43,461 compared to $36,631, a difference of 18.6%), and median household income ($83,607 compared to $70,539, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $35,003, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $47,015, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $53,847, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 45.4%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and single male poverty (13.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 66.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.6%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.50%), family households (63.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.09 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.0%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.5%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.1%).