Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Chippewa

Good
Fair
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,140,435 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.257% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 1,257.5 Chippewa.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Chippewa Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $36,631, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $80,005, a difference of 24.3%), and median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $46,368, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $47,015, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $53,847, a difference of 13.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynChippewa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
25.0%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 49.0%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 42.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 19.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynChippewa
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.7%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 67.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynChippewa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
81.3%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.4%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.06 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
42.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.9%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 5th grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.7%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynChippewa
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%