Romanian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,366,854 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 24.5 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $36,631, a difference of 32.3%), median household income ($91,994 compared to $70,539, a difference of 30.4%), and median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $46,368, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $35,003, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 46.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 85.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 48.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.3%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.8% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.1%).