Guyanese vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,073,712 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to a decrease of 13.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 36.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $47,015, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $35,003, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,351 compared to $53,847, a difference of 4.6%), median family income ($93,373 compared to $86,852, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,966 compared to $83,943, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 33.9%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 28.0%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 59.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.7%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (41.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 210.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 117.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 87.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 28.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 61.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 87.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 85.7%), master's degree (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and bachelor's degree (34.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 85.2%), hearing disability (2.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 74.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%).