Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Chippewa
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,354,179 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 21.9 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,100 compared to $70,539, a difference of 26.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.5%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $36,631, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $35,003, a difference of 15.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 38.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 78.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.4%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.8%), family households (64.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.87%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |