Ethiopian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Chippewa
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,531,157 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 Chippewa.
Ethiopian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,569 compared to $36,631, a difference of 27.1%), median household income ($89,640 compared to $70,539, a difference of 27.1%), and median family income ($108,251 compared to $86,852, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 14.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $53,847, a difference of 20.7%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Excellent 25.0% |
Ethiopian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 46.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 44.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.4%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Ethiopian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 96.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 59.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Ethiopian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 81.3% |
Ethiopian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 42.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), family households (61.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 42.6% |
Ethiopian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Ethiopian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.61%), high school diploma (89.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ethiopian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |