Luxembourger vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,757,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 14.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $36,631, a difference of 24.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.3%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $70,539, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $47,015, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $53,847, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 60.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 56.9%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 101.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 61.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 76.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 41.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.3%).