Crow vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,584,998 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 31.0%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $36,631, a difference of 15.4%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $86,852, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $47,015, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.75%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $40,287, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 75.7%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 61.0%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 211.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 205.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 152.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (14.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.82 compared to 3.20, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and associate's degree (37.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.9%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.52%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.4%).