Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Chippewa
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,450,696 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.941% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 941.3 Chippewa.
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $83,943, a difference of 20.8%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $70,539, a difference of 20.4%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $36,631, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $47,015, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,003, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $53,847, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Excellent 25.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.7%), male poverty (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.7%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 73.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 42.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |