Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Chippewa

Good
Fair
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,450,696 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.941% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 941.3 Chippewa.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Chippewa Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $83,943, a difference of 20.8%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $70,539, a difference of 20.4%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $36,631, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $47,015, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,003, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $53,847, a difference of 12.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianChippewa
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Excellent
25.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.7%), male poverty (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianChippewa
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 73.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianChippewa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianChippewa
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
42.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianChippewa
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%