Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Chippewa
1,427
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
308th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Mexico Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,706,057 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $36,631, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $47,015, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $35,003, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $83,943, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $80,005, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,931 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,639 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,160 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,114 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,960 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,236 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,422 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,809 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $84,910 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,801 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 39.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (34.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Excellent 16.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.9% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.1% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.7% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 18.2%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households (69.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.1% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 31.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.4% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.52 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.5% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.9%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 122.8%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 86.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 84.5% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 82.4% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 79.5% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.7% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 53.7% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.5% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 33.7% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.75%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
Disability | Fair 11.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Fair 3.0% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |