Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Chippewa
1,392
SOCIAL INDEX
11.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
311th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Latin America Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,429,475 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.3%), median household income ($75,420 compared to $70,539, a difference of 6.9%), and wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($86,989 compared to $86,852, a difference of 0.16%), per capita income ($36,823 compared to $36,631, a difference of 0.53%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.87%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latin America | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,823 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,989 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,420 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,049 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,941 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,307 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,387 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,166 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,219 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,265 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latin America | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 55.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latin America | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.4% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latin America | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.3% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 14.8%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.85%), currently married (43.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latin America | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.2% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.42 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.8% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.92%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latin America | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.8% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.3% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 101.0%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and college, under 1 year (56.3% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%), bachelor's degree (30.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latin America | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.8% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 85.0% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.9% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 43.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.23%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latin America | Chippewa |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |