Canadian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,640,317 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.267% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 267.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,769 compared to $94,990, a difference of 8.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $104,993, a difference of 7.5%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,858 compared to $47,041, a difference of 2.6%), median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $59,351, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $54,369, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.2%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.39%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%).