Romanian vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Laotians

Excellent
Good
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,175,485 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.270% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 270.3 Laotians.
Romanian Integration in Laotian Communities

Romanian vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $66,306, a difference of 3.4%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $94,990, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($50,244 compared to $50,343, a difference of 0.20%), median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $42,133, a difference of 1.1%), and median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $59,351, a difference of 1.2%).
Romanian vs Laotian Income
Income MetricRomanianLaotian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Poor
26.4%

Romanian vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 9.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.72%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.88%).
Romanian vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianLaotian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%

Romanian vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.67%).
Romanian vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianLaotian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Romanian vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
Romanian vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Good
82.9%

Romanian vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.1%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.070%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and family households (64.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Romanian vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianLaotian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.5%

Romanian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.4%).
Romanian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Romanian vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and high school diploma (90.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (49.7% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Romanian vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Romanian vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Romanian vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricRomanianLaotian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%