Hungarian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,248,788 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.456. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 57.1 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.1%), median household income ($86,920 compared to $94,990, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $54,369, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,426 compared to $47,041, a difference of 3.5%), median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $59,351, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($47,795 compared to $50,343, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.7%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.4%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.4%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.44%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.9%).