Arapaho vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Laotians
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,455,973 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.976% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 3,976.0 Laotians.
Arapaho vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $104,993, a difference of 46.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $111,051, a difference of 46.2%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $47,041, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $66,306, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,369, a difference of 23.6%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Poor 26.4% |
Arapaho vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 85.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 24.0%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Arapaho vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 191.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 145.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 137.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Arapaho vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Good 82.9% |
Arapaho vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 65.5%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.26, a difference of 11.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Arapaho vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.7%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Arapaho vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 97.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 82.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.19%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.81%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Arapaho vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.9%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |