Bhutanese vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Laotians

Exceptional
Good
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,864,151 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Laotians.
Bhutanese Integration in Laotian Communities

Bhutanese vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $66,306, a difference of 9.0%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $112,859, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $47,041, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $42,133, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $50,343, a difference of 3.9%).
Bhutanese vs Laotian Income
Income MetricBhutaneseLaotian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Poor
26.4%

Bhutanese vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and family poverty (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.69%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Bhutanese vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseLaotian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.0%

Bhutanese vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.9%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Bhutanese vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseLaotian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Bhutanese vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Bhutanese vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Good
82.9%

Bhutanese vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.13%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.27%).
Bhutanese vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseLaotian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.5%

Bhutanese vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.7%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Bhutanese vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Bhutanese vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.4%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and associate's degree (51.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%).
Bhutanese vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%

Bhutanese vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Bhutanese vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseLaotian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%