Swedish vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Laotians

Excellent
Good
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,486,384 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 11.9 Laotians.
Swedish Integration in Laotian Communities

Swedish vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.6%), median household income ($88,524 compared to $94,990, a difference of 7.3%), and median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $42,133, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $54,369, a difference of 2.6%), per capita income ($45,750 compared to $47,041, a difference of 2.8%), and median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $59,351, a difference of 3.3%).
Swedish vs Laotian Income
Income MetricSwedishLaotian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Poor
26.4%

Swedish vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Swedish vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishLaotian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.0%

Swedish vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.4%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Swedish vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishLaotian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Swedish vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 26.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Swedish vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Good
82.9%

Swedish vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple households (49.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Swedish vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishLaotian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Exceptional
28.5%

Swedish vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Swedish vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

Swedish vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.89%).
Swedish vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.3%

Swedish vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Swedish vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricSwedishLaotian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.4%