Subsaharan African vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sub-Saharan Africans

Laotians

Tragic
Good
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,154,763 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Laotians.
Subsaharan African Integration in Laotian Communities

Subsaharan African vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $104,993, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $111,051, a difference of 22.5%), and median household income ($77,631 compared to $94,990, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $42,133, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $54,369, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $50,343, a difference of 14.1%).
Subsaharan African vs Laotian Income
Income MetricSubsaharan AfricanLaotian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,152
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,748
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,631
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,118
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,408
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,391
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,691
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,235
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,691
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,615
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Poor
26.4%

Subsaharan African vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.4%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.9%).
Subsaharan African vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricSubsaharan AfricanLaotian
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Subsaharan African vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Subsaharan African vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSubsaharan AfricanLaotian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Subsaharan African vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Subsaharan African vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSubsaharan AfricanLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.7%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Good
82.9%

Subsaharan African vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 6.0%).
Subsaharan African vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSubsaharan AfricanLaotian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
28.5%

Subsaharan African vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.4%).
Subsaharan African vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSubsaharan AfricanLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.9%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.4%

Subsaharan African vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%).
Subsaharan African vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricSubsaharan AfricanLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.3%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.8%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

Subsaharan African vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Subsaharan African vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricSubsaharan AfricanLaotian
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%