Shoshone vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,588,178 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.932. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.108% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 107.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $111,051, a difference of 32.9%), median household income ($72,660 compared to $94,990, a difference of 30.7%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $112,859, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $54,369, a difference of 11.6%), and median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $42,133, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 52.0%), single male poverty (16.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 40.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 101.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 54.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.3%), births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.1%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.9%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 66.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.5%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.0%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.2%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%).