Choctaw vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,672,473 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $94,990, a difference of 35.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $111,051, a difference of 35.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $104,993, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,369, a difference of 19.6%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $59,351, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 29.5%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.6%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 62.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.6%).