Carpatho Rusyn vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,162,447 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 35.6 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $54,369, a difference of 10.7%), median household income ($86,635 compared to $94,990, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $66,306, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,248 compared to $47,041, a difference of 0.44%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $59,351, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($40,825 compared to $42,133, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.6%), single father poverty (18.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.1%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and family households (61.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.81%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.9%), high school diploma (92.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and ged/equivalency (89.1% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 0.25%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.5%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.6%).