Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,917,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 28.7 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $111,051, a difference of 21.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $104,993, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $94,990, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $42,133, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $54,369, a difference of 11.5%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $50,343, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 35.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.99%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (62.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.2%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.010%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%).