Chickasaw vs Laotian 11th Grade
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Laotian
11th Grade
11th Grade Comparison
Chickasaw
Laotians
92.3%
11TH GRADE
31.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
92.6%
11TH GRADE
54.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Laotian 11th Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with at least 11th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 92.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,854,130 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with at least 11th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265 and weighted average of 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%.
11th Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Laotian |
| Minimum | 83.0% | 75.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 17.0% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 91.6% | 93.1% |
| Median | 91.6% | 93.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 89.8% | 92.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 93.4% | 96.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Laotians by 11th Grade
In terms of 11th grade, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Chile (92.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Indonesia (92.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Arapaho (92.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Western Asia (92.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (92.4%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Pakistan (92.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (92.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Indian (Asian) (92.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Asian (92.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Shoshone (92.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 11th Grade |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 57.3 /100 | #170 | Average 92.6% |
| Laotians | 54.4 /100 | #171 | Average 92.6% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 52.3 /100 | #172 | Average 92.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 51.5 /100 | #173 | Average 92.5% |
| Asians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 92.5% |
| Shoshone | 48.9 /100 | #175 | Average 92.5% |
| Spaniards | 46.9 /100 | #176 | Average 92.5% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 45.0 /100 | #177 | Average 92.5% |
| Sudanese | 43.4 /100 | #178 | Average 92.5% |
| Creek | 40.9 /100 | #179 | Average 92.4% |
| Inupiat | 40.7 /100 | #180 | Average 92.4% |
| Cherokee | 40.7 /100 | #181 | Average 92.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 38.6 /100 | #182 | Fair 92.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 37.6 /100 | #183 | Fair 92.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 92.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 36.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 92.4% |
| Arapaho | 35.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 92.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 35.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 92.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 33.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 92.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 33.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 92.4% |
| Chickasaw | 31.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 92.3% |