Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Latvia

Immigrants from Oceania

Excellent
Average
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,252,976 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 72.5 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $45,220, a difference of 12.6%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $55,712, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($51,555 compared to $47,617, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,680, a difference of 3.7%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,914
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,826
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,602
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,555
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,422
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,099
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,737
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,522
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,454
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,298
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Average
25.6%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.4%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.75%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Good
8.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
11.4%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.93%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.1%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.45%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.1%
Excellent
30.6%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.3%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.9%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.1%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.1%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.1%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.62%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Fair
2.5%