Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Oceania
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,381,288 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.158% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 157.5 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $45,220, a difference of 14.5%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $55,712, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $47,617, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $64,416, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Excellent $45,220 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Excellent $106,453 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Exceptional $89,100 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Excellent $47,617 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Good $55,712 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Good $40,297 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Exceptional $53,680 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Excellent $97,623 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Excellent $103,705 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Exceptional $64,416 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Average 25.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.50%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 12.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 8.7% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 11.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 13.3% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Excellent 19.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Average 13.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Good 16.9% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Good 15.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Good 16.0% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Good 20.7% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Good 28.7% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.4% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.89%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Excellent 17.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Poor 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 7.5% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Excellent 65.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Poor 79.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Exceptional 37.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 76.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Good 46.9% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 6.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Average 46.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.0%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 18.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 9.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 57.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 21.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.4%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Poor 2.2% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 97.1% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Poor 96.8% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Poor 94.5% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Poor 93.4% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Fair 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Fair 90.9% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Fair 88.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Fair 85.5% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Average 65.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Average 59.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Fair 45.8% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Fair 37.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Fair 14.7% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Good 4.6% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.8% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Fair 11.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Fair 11.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Poor 24.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 48.0% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Good 6.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Fair 2.5% |